Clawgate Clawgate
Prompt compression

How Clawgate saves AI spend by compression

Every time a coding assistant sends a request, it re-sends a huge pile of context: the conversation so far, old tool outputs, logs, and file dumps. The AI model charges per token of input, so all that repeated bulk costs money on every single request. Clawgate sits in the middle, between the developer’s tool and the AI provider. Before the request goes out, it rewrites the bulky parts to be shorter while keeping the meaning intact. The model receives a smaller request, so you’re billed for fewer input tokens.

Measured

What it takes off a request

Four real agent workloads, measured before and after compression. The more repetitive the material, the more comes off — which is why bulky tool output saves the most and unique code saves the least.

Tokens per request

Before vs after
Before and after token counts on four real agent workloads, with savings between 47% and 92%.

Share of the request saved

Up to 92% fewer tokens
Compression saves 92% of a code-search request, 92% of SRE incident debugging, 73% of GitHub issue triage, and 47% of codebase exploration.

The same figures, in full:

Workload Before After Savings
Code search (100 results)17,7651,40892%
SRE incident debugging65,6945,11892%
GitHub issue triage54,17414,76173%
Codebase exploration78,50241,25447%
Full benchmarks & methodology →
Answer quality

Fewer tokens, same answers

Sending less only counts if the work still comes back right. On standard public benchmarks, accuracy held.

GSM8K math
0.870 to 0.870

Accuracy unchanged

TruthfulQA factual
+0.030

Accuracy improved

SQuAD v2 QA
97% score

at 19% compression

BFCL tool calls
97% score

at 32% compression

Why it works

Why it actually saves money, not just theater

Savings land before billing

The provider counts tokens on what it receives. Because Clawgate compresses upstream of that meter, the savings are real, not cosmetic.

It trims the cheap wins first

Repetitive JSON, logs, and duplicated context, the stuff that’s bulky but low-value, get squeezed. Unique code and the developer’s actual questions are left untouched.

Answer quality holds

The most recent messages and the critical reasoning are never altered, so the AI’s answers stay the same. Your team notices nothing except a lower bill.

What compression never touches

The savings come out of the old, repetitive material that piles up over a long session. Everything the model needs in full is passed straight through.

  • The most recent turns, so the current line of work is never altered
  • The system prompt and the tool definitions
  • The model’s own reasoning blocks, preserved exactly
  • Unique code and prose, preserved rather than squeezed

It fails open, always

If compression can’t help a request, or anything looks off, the request goes out unchanged. The worst case is a request that simply isn’t compressed, which is exactly how it would have run with the feature off. It never blocks a developer’s work.

One switch, and you see the dollars

An admin turns it on for the organization and sets how hard to compress. Developers change nothing. Because Clawgate is already in the request path, it records what each request saved and shows it back to you in dollars on the dashboard.

Measured on real agent workloads and standard public benchmarks. Recent context and model reasoning are never altered.

Full benchmarks & methodology →

Send less. Pay less. Same answers.